State v. Freeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the defendant failed to point to prejudice flowing from variance, variance was held to be nonma-terial, and trial court abused its discretion by dismissing complaint because of variance
• “The written ruling here unambiguously dismisses the citation with prejudice. * * * We conclude that regardless of what the court may or may not have intended, the state has statutory authority to appeal the order as written. ORS 138.060(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Langmayer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 10×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-09-27· cited 9×
• State v. Hilligoss
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-07· cited 5×
• State v. Stavenjord
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-07· cited 3×
• State v. Bravo-Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Swain
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-01-04· cited 76×
• State v. Atkinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 10×
• State v. Bethune
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-03-16· cited 6×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-10-17· cited 5×
• State v. Hibbs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-28· cited 2×