State v. Starr
Citations
- 24 N.M. 180
- 173 P. 674
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. It is a general rule of criminal evidence tbat on the trial of a person accused of crime proof of a distinct, independent offense is inadmissible. P. 185</p> <p>2. Generally speaking, evidence of other crimes is competent to prove the specific crime charged when it tends to establish: (1) Motive; (2) intent; (3) the absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the other; (5) the identity of the person charged with the commission of the crime on trial.</p> <p>P. 185</p> <p>3. All objections to the admission or exclusion of evidence, its competency, relevancy or sufficiency, and as to the competency of witnesses and their examination, must be made in the trial court. They cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. P. 188</p> <p>4. Whether a sheriff is justified in pursuing and arresting, without warant, one who has been confined in jail and has broken therefrom, does not depend upon whether the imprisonment was legal, but on whether the officer has reasonable cause to suspect the commission of a felony. P. 191</p> <p>5. Where several persons are jointly indicted, they cannot claim separate trial as a matter of right; this is a matter of sound discretion, to be exercised by the court with all due regard and tenderness to prisoners, according to the known humanity of our criminal jurisprudence; and an order refusing such trial will not be reviewed. P. 191</p> <p>6. The granting or denying of a motion for continuance is within the discretion of the trial court, and unless such discretion has been abused to the injury of the defendant, the denial of such motion will not constitute error. P. 191</p> <p>7. There was no error in the court having allowed the jury to separate, before the case was submitted to them, in the absence of a showing that accused was prejudiced thereby.</p> <p>P. 192</p> <p>8. The limitatio
Judges: Being, Hanna, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1936-07-21· cited 148×
- State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-10-08· cited 71×
- State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-10-30· cited 52×
- State v. TurnbowNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-07-30· cited 52×
- Jackson v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-11-30· cited 44×
- State v. MasonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-08-30· cited 36×
- State v. NietoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-06-19· cited 28×
- State v. ClementsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1926-06-08· cited 23×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1931-09-28· cited 22×
- State v. CarpioNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-07-20· cited 20×
- State v. VelardeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-07-28· cited 18×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-03-28· cited 17×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1928-02-10· cited 17×
- State v. RennerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1929-06-11· cited 17×
- State v. LazarovichNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-07-25· cited 16×
- State v. McKenzieNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1943-11-17· cited 12×
- State v. EvansNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-02-01· cited 9×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1918-07-15· cited 8×
- State v. BurkettNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1927-11-09· cited 6×
- People v. De RennaNew York County Courts· 1938-03-03· cited 5×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals· 1901-10-15· cited 2,413×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-08-17· cited 154×
- Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1905-11-08· cited 141×
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont· 1901-02-09· cited 31×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-11-28· cited 24×
- State v. OrfanakisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1916-06-27· cited 23×
- James v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-07-16· cited 21×
- State v. CarterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1915-11-16· cited 14×
- Lorenzino v. State ex rel. JamesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1913-10-14· cited 13×
- Goddard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1906-03-24· cited 13×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1916-02-21· cited 12×
- McDaniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1898-01-19· cited 11×
- Shelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1889-04-10· cited 8×
- State v. PinoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1916-05-01· cited 7×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1910-04-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.