State v. Pino
Citations
- 21 N.M. 660
- 158 P. 131
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Where a party complains of an erroneous decision of the court trying a cause, either in the exclusion or admission of evidence, he must point out in his motion for new trial, with reasonable certainty, the particular evidence admitted or excluded; otherwise; the Supreme Court will not consider the alleged error.</p> <p>P. 663</p> <p>2. The general rule is that one crime cannot be proved by establishing another, but to this general rule there are many exceptions. A notable exception is where the two crimes are connected.</p> <p>P. 664</p>
Judges: Hanna, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StarrNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-12-31· cited 37×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-03-28· cited 17×
- State v. BorregoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1948-06-23· cited 16×
- State v. LazarovichNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-07-25· cited 16×
- State v. BabcockNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-08-20· cited 5×
- State v. SnyderNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-02-06· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.