Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 672 P.2d 660
  • 100 N.M. 487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that absence in jury instruction of an essential element of the crime is reversible error
  • reversing Court of Appeals’ decision that refused to find error where defendant submitted incorrect instructions
  • premising reversal based on improper jury instructions on the court’s discretion “to prevent injustice where a fundamental right of the accused has been violated”
  • premising reversal based on improper jury instructions on the court's discretion \to prevent injustice where a fundamental right of the accused has been violated\
  • stating it “is within the province of [the appellate court], in its discretion, to prevent injustice where a fundamental right of the accused has been violated”
  • “[T]here may be fundamental error if the instruction given differs materially from the required instruction,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Payne, Federici, Riordan, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.