Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/18/2022
State v. Snowden
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4119
Syllabus
The trial court's order overruling appellant's petition for postconviction relief and motion for leave to file a motion for new trial was not an abuse of discretion the petition was untimely, and appellant failed to establish that he had been unavoidably prevented from discovering the information on which his petition and motion were based. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-16· cited 12×
- State v. DawsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-03· cited 9×
- State v. DevaughnsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-06· cited 7×
- State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-09· cited 4×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-09· cited 4×
- State v. YatesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-02· cited 3×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-06· cited 3×
- State v. CrossleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-11· cited 3×
- State v. HaydenOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-07· cited 2×
- State v. StefanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-02· cited 1×
- State v. SnowdenOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.