State v. Snow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “nonamenability to probation may constitute a substantial and compelling reason for an upward durational departure, as well as a substantial and compelling reason for a dis-positional departure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Montgomery
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-10-19· cited 198×
• Malutin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2009-01-09· cited 11×
• State v. Pearce
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2015-01-23· cited 9×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vorhees v. Baltazar
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 62×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-07-14· cited 53×
• State v. Morton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 52×
• State v. Snow
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-10-27· cited 45×
• State v. Singleton
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-01-21· cited 39×
• State v. Denney
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-04-27· cited 33×
• State v. Tiffany
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 32×
• State v. Yardley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-04-16· cited 25×
• State v. Ruiz-Reyes
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-02-01· cited 21×
• State v. Ippert
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-01-28· cited 18×
• Edwards v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-07-25· cited 18×
• McComb v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-07-23· cited 15×
• United States v. Cheever
  D. Kansas· 2006-03-29· cited 14×
• State v. Phelps
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-03-09· cited 7×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-12-14· cited 6×
• State v. Benoit
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-06-28· cited 5×
• State v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-06-20· cited 3×