Edwards v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting consideration of all issues necessary to effectuate the mandate
• “If an issue could have been raised in a prior appeal but was not raised in that appeal, an appellate court should not consider the issue on a second appeal, even if the issue was not explicitly or implicitly decided on the first appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Westhoff Sand Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-06-09· cited 70×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-03-12· cited 46×
• State v. Dumars
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-04-06· cited 33×
• Leffel v. CITY OF MISSION HILLS
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-08-26· cited 19×
• Harris v. City Cycle Sales
  Tenth Circuit· 2024-08-20· cited 7×
• State v. Snow
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-11-14· cited 6×
• State v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-03-15· cited 3×
• State v. Soto
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-26
• Fawcett Trust v. Oil Producers, Inc. of Kansas
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-10-02