Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/19/2012

State v. Montgomery

Citations

295 Kan. 837
286 P.3d 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the potential result of finding that a probationer was not amenable to probation in the future was not a sufficient reason to find that an actual controversy existed
holding that the court does not decide moot issues or render advisory opinions
holding that this court does not decide moot questions or issue advisory opinions
concluding defendant’s appeal of his probation revocation sentence was moot because “the prison term that [petitioner] was ordered to serve has been completed”
holding that an appellate court does not consider moot issues
noting that speculative consequences insufficient to prevent otherwise concluded legal dispute from being moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.