State v. Smith
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2358
Syllabus
Double jeopardy mistrial motion to dismiss motion to quash subpoenas. The trial court did not err in denying the appellants' motion to dismiss for double jeopardy because they have not demonstrated that the trial court intended to provoke a mistrial. The trial court did not err in granting the State's motion to quash subpoenas because the record was clear as to the intentions of the trial court in engaging in ex parte communications with the State.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 1,492×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court· 2014-02-19· cited 101×
- United States v. Harry Thomas (79-5271) and Anthony L. Romano (79-5175)Sixth Circuit· 1984-02-23· cited 73×
- Supportive Solutions Training Academy L.L.C. v. Electronic Classroom of TomorrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-12· cited 8×
- Gangale v. CoyneOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-27· cited 8×
- Cleveland v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.