United States v. Harry Thomas (79-5271) and Anthony L. Romano (79-5175)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]rosecutorial behavior will bar 8 No. 10-3280 a second trial only where such behavior was ‘intentionally’ calculated to cause or invite mistrial.”
• “To warrant a new trial ... prosecutorial misconduct ‘must be so pronounced and persistent that it permeates the entire atmosphere of the trial.’”
• no double jeopardy bar to retrial where the Court's “review of the record leads us to conclude that none of the prosecutor's behavior here will pass the intentional- goading-into-mistrial test of Oregon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).