State v. Upton
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1660
Syllabus
Motion to dismiss; motion for reconsideration; mistrial; jury polling; double jeopardy. The trial court did not err when it denied defendant-appellant's motion to dismiss two counts pursuant to the double-jeopardy doctrine. Specifically, double jeopardy did not bar retrial of the two counts where the trial court granted defendant-appellant's motion for a mistrial due to irregularities in the jury polling process, and not because of prosecutorial misconduct.
Judges: Klatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 864×
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 824×
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-29· cited 621×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State v. GloverOhio Supreme Court· 1988-01-13· cited 270×
- United States v. Harry Thomas (79-5271) and Anthony L. Romano (79-5175)Sixth Circuit· 1984-02-23· cited 73×
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 50×
- United States v. John Sennett White and John Michael WilsonFifth Circuit· 1992-10-09· cited 48×
- State v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-30· cited 42×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-20· cited 1×
- Cleveland v. LombardoOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.