Skip to main content

State v. Bennett

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3453

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) jail-time credit. The trial court did not err when it imposed discretionary consecutive sentences because it supported its findings as required by R.C. 2929.14 with evidence and facts from the record. The trial court did not err when it assigned jail-time credit to the appellant's sentence because the cases were unrelated. The trial court assigned the correct number of jail-time credit to the appellant's sentences.

Judges: Laster Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.