Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 163 P.3d 1194
  • 144 Idaho 482
  • 2007 Ida. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he burden of proof is on the state to show that the search ... fell within one of the well-recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement.”
  • presenting a defendant with lawful options, even undesirable ones, does not render a consent involuntary
  • presenting a defendant with lawful options, even undesirable ones, does not render a consent involuntary
  • holding acquiescence is not “voluntary consent”
  • holding acquiescence is not “voluntary consent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Eismann, Burdick, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.