Idaho Supreme Court· 6/1/2010
State v. Doe
Citations
- 233 P.3d 1275
- 149 Idaho 353
- 2010 Ida. LEXIS 94
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that demanding a urine sample is a search because it “intrudes on bodily privacy”
- requiring parents of a juvenile to undergo drug testing as a condition of their child’s probation was not permissible because the parents were not under the State’s oversight and do not share the same diminished expectation of privacy as their child
- “THC is an abbreviation for tetrahydrocannabinol, the active compound in marijuana.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. IDAHO STATE PATROLIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-05-18· cited 37×
- In re Contempt of DorseyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-09-09· cited 15×
- State v. Geirrod Detloph StarkIdaho Court of Appeals· 2013-04-04· cited 9×
- In the Interest of A.C. and A.J., Minor Children, J.C., FatherCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-07-16· cited 7×
- CAPSTAR RADIO OPERATING CO. v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-08-25· cited 6×
- TOWER ASSET SUB INC. v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-08-25· cited 2×
- Capstar Radio v. Douglas and Brenda LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-08-25
- State v. Bryce S. MendelIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-02-11
- Blomstrom v. TrippWashington Supreme Court· 2017-10-05
- State of Tennessee v. Greg PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2020-03-05
- State v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-08-11
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 1,478×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 982×
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 861×
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court· 1997-04-15· cited 524×
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 523×
- Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. EarlsSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 498×
- State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court· 1996-07-29· cited 472×
- Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 468×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.