Skip to main content

State v. Doe

Citations

  • 233 P.3d 1275
  • 149 Idaho 353
  • 2010 Ida. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that demanding a urine sample is a search because it “intrudes on bodily privacy”
  • requiring parents of a juvenile to undergo drug testing as a condition of their child’s probation was not permissible because the parents were not under the State’s oversight and do not share the same diminished expectation of privacy as their child
  • “THC is an abbreviation for tetrahydrocannabinol, the active compound in marijuana.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.