Idaho Supreme Court· 6/13/2019

State v. Hoskins

Citations

443 P.3d 231
165 Idaho 217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding issues must be raised in trial court and parties will be held to theory upon which case was presented
observing that application of the right-result-wrong-theory rule requires preservation of arguments supporting application of the correct legal theory
ruling State has burden to demonstrate warrantless search fell within well-recognized exception to warrant requirement or was otherwise reasonable under circumstances
finding the State argued consent below and therefore the plain-view doctrine argument not preserved on appeal
explaining the term standing as “shorthand for the question [of] whether the moving party had a legitimate expectation of privacy . . . .” (citation omitted)
explaining the term standing as “shorthand for the question [of] whether the moving party had a legitimate expectation of privacy . . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burdick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.