Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/26/2012
State v. Smith
Citations
- 252 Or. App. 518
- 287 P.3d 1210
- 2012 WL 4378561
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an argument was preserved for appeal because the evidence presented, the nature of the motion, and the legal sources cited made the trial court “well aware of the issue before it” (quoting State v. Wyatt, 331 Or 335, 343, 15 P3d 22 (2000))
- trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence of DUII obtained following an unlawful stop
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
- State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court· 2004-04-29· cited 110×
- State v. ThompkinOregon Supreme Court· 2006-09-14· cited 54×
- State v. AylesOregon Supreme Court· 2010-08-12· cited 41×
- State v. RadtkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-20· cited 14×
- State v. LayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-06· cited 12×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-27· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.