State v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a reasonable person would believe that he or she was not free to leave when the officer “wrote down defendant’s name and date of birth” and “then immediately returned to his vehicle and ran a [warrant] check”
• concluding that reasonable person would believe that he or she was not free to leave when the officer “wrote down [the] defendant’s name and date of birth and *** then immediately returned to his vehicle and ran a [warrant] check”
• where an officer “(1) asked defendant, a passenger in a stopped vehicle, if he had any warrants; (2) requested defendant’s identification; (3) wrote down defendant’s name and date of birth; and (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 8×
• State v. Morfin-Estrada
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 6×
• State v. Soto
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 6×
• State v. ZACCONE
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-21· cited 5×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 4×
• State v. Canfield
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-01· cited 2×