State v. Smith
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 1026
Syllabus
Allied offenses void sentence authorized by law res judicata. Postconviction motion to merge allied offenses was barred by res judicata where court never considered whether to merge allied offenses since the parties agreed the defendant's convictions were not allied offenses. Argument that consecutive sentences were contrary to law was not properly before the court where defendant failed to raise the argument in the trial court.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re J.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-09· cited 2×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-23· cited 2×
- State v. GravelyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-23
- State v. R.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-13
- State v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-05
- Shaker Hts. v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-05
- In re G.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-12
- State v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-21
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. HoldcroftOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-20· cited 230×
- State v. Williams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 230×
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-05-03· cited 40×
- Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-29· cited 20×
- In re Estate of O'TooleOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-10· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.