Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/21/2026
State v. Andrews
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1861
Syllabus
Confrontation clause; body camera; testimony. The trial court erred in allowing the body-camera footage to be admitted at trial because the victim did not appear to testify, and the appellant was not permitted to cross-examine the victim in violation of the appellant's right to confrontation.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court· 2011-02-28· cited 1,277×
- Ohio v. ClarkSupreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 539×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. JesterOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-26· cited 113×
- State v. KeairnsOhio Supreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 67×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-25· cited 45×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1979-06-13· cited 13×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-23· cited 10×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-19· cited 8×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-04· cited 3×
- Myers v. Univ. Hosps. Health Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-30· cited 3×
- State v. FinkleaOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-05· cited 2×
- State v. OatnealOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-03· cited 1×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-25· cited 1×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.