State v. Gravely

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2153

Syllabus

Claims that trial court erred by imposing consecutive sentences without judicial fact-finding and by imposing four-year prison term on major drug offender specification were barred by res judicata because appellant did not raise them on direct appeal or in prior postconviction motion. Because the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the charges and personal jurisdiction over the appellant, the alleged errors rendered the sentences voidable, not void, and were subject to res judicata. Judgment affirmed.