Supreme Court of New Jersey· 4/12/1971
State v. Smith
Citations
- 276 A.2d 369
- 58 N.J. 202
- 1971 N.J. LEXIS 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that requiring temporary forfeiture of a driver’s license for a single incident of marijuana use unconnected with actual driving has a reasonable relation to the legislative goals of punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation
- stating that “[i]n fixing a penalty for violation of its penal code, the Legislature may properly consider the elements of punishment, deterrence and rehabilitation”
- law requiring suspension of driver's license for narcotics conviction rationally related to state interest in highway safety and deterrence of narcotics usage
- law requiring suspension of driver’s license for narcotics conviction rationally related to state interest in highway safety and deterrence of narcotics usage
- suspension of driver’s license of individual convicted of marihuana use unrelated to driving did not constitute cruel or unusual punishment
- allowing lay testimony that a decedent was mentally unsound
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-03-05· cited 731×
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
- State v. GaliciaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-06-19· cited 199×
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1972-07-17· cited 156×
- Barone v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-06-23· cited 151×
- State v. LagaresSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-02-06· cited 125×
- Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-06-17· cited 82×
- State v. FearickSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-01-08· cited 66×
- State v. AmelioSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-12-22· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. StrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-03· cited 48×
- New Jersey Division of Child Protection and PermanencyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-10-04· cited 48×
- Johnson v. State Hearing Examiner's OfficeWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-08-26· cited 46×
- State v. BakerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-01-21· cited 39×
- State v. CorbittSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-10-06· cited 38×
- State v. PrattNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-06-28· cited 29×
- Quiller v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-02-05· cited 26×
- Christian Bros. Institute v. Northern New Jersey Interscholastic LeagueSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-06-15· cited 26×
- State v. ThompsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-03-27· cited 23×
- State v. BlowNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-12-06· cited 20×
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-12-19· cited 20×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court· 1966-05-02· cited 945×
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 341×
- Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court· 1926-11-23· cited 182×
- Reitz v. MealeySupreme Court· 1941-11-10· cited 165×
- Commonwealth v. LeisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-01-09· cited 86×
- Lattimer v. Crystal Clear, Inc.Supreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 54×
- United States v. One 1962 Ford ThunderbirdN.D. Illinois· 1964-08-20· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.