Quiller v. Bowman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the right to drive is not a fundamental right”
• applying federal due process test to state constitutional due process challenge to state statute requiring suspension of driver’s license upon conviction for possession of controlled substance or marijuana
• statute bears rational relationship to legitimate state interest in punishing and deterring lawbreaking
• statute bears rational relationship to legitimate state interest in punishing and deterring lawbreaking
• “The legislature could reasonably assume that a person who possesses illegal drugs will use the drugs, that a drug user will drive while under the influence of drugs, and that drug use impairs a driver’s judgment.”
• substantive due process and equal protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).