Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/3/1990

Commonwealth v. Strunk

Citations

582 A.2d 1326
400 Pa. Super. 25
1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that 90-day driver’s license suspension based on an underage defendant’s conviction of possessing alcohol, which was not related to the operation of a motor vehicle, did not violate substantive due process
rejecting substantive due process challenge to statute requiring driver's license suspension for underage possession or consumption of alcohol
rejecting substantive due process challenge to statute requiring driver’s license suspension for underage possession or consumption of alcohol
rejecting substantive due process challenge to statute requiring driver’s license suspension for underage possession or consumption of alcohol
upholding the suspension of underage defendant’s driver's license, based on conviction for possession of alcohol, although violation was not connected to operation or possession of motor vehicle
“[W]hile an individual’s right to possess a driver’s license is considered a ‘privilege’ in the constitutional sense, the right to do so is not fundamental.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Popovich, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.