Skip to main content
· 11/23/1926

Van Oster v. Kansas

Citations

  • 272 U.S. 465
  • 47 S. Ct. 133
  • 71 L. Ed. 354
  • 1926 U.S. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding constitutionality of statute that declared any vehicle used in the state to transport liquor a common nuisance and subject to forfeiture
  • “[A] state in the exercise of its police [power] may forfeit property . . . .”
  • “It has long been settled that statutory forfeitures of property entrusted by the innocent owner or lienor to another who uses it in violation of the revenue laws ... is not a violation of the due process clause.”
  • automobile used to transport illegal liquor during prohibition
  • car used to illegally transport liquor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.