· 11/23/1926
Van Oster v. Kansas
Citations
- 272 U.S. 465
- 47 S. Ct. 133
- 71 L. Ed. 354
- 1926 U.S. LEXIS 15
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding constitutionality of statute that declared any vehicle used in the state to transport liquor a common nuisance and subject to forfeiture
- “[A] state in the exercise of its police [power] may forfeit property . . . .”
- “It has long been settled that statutory forfeitures of property entrusted by the innocent owner or lienor to another who uses it in violation of the revenue laws ... is not a violation of the due process clause.”
- automobile used to transport illegal liquor during prohibition
- car used to illegally transport liquor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.