State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case for entry of a directed verdict because defendant’s “concealment of inculpating information was protected by her privilege against self-incrimination” (citing Carson, 262 S.E.2d 918)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Ozmint
  D. South Carolina· 2005-10-24· cited 9×
• Percival v. People
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-08-12· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Kastigar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
• United States v. Apfelbaum
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 352×
• State v. McHoney
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-19· cited 100×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-05· cited 24×
• State v. Gates
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-11-01· cited 21×
• State v. Carson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-02-19· cited 14×
• Bradley v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-09-19· cited 11×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-04· cited 3×