Bradley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the custodial determination is an objective analysis based on whether a reasonable person would have concluded that he was in police custody
• the custodial determination is an objective analysis based on whether a reasonable person would have concluded that he was in police custody
• “The relevant inquiry is whether a reasonable man in the suspect’s position would have understood himself to be in custody.”
• \Miranda warnings are required for official interrogations only when a suspect 'has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.'\ (quoting Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Easler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 91×
• State v. Evans
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-06-09· cited 33×
• State v. Sprouse
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 28×
• Lindsey v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30· cited 13×
• State v. Navy
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-31· cited 10×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-20· cited 3×
• State v. Brian L. Halverson
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-11-13· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Jackson v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
• Berkemer v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
• Mathis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-06· cited 760×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-23· cited 5×