Skip to main content
D. South Carolina· 10/24/2005

Smith v. Ozmint

Citations

  • 394 F. Supp. 2d 787
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25448
  • 2005 WL 2709339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting a state employee can, in some circumstances, be held personally liable by a federal court for some intentional torts
  • finding negligence claim did not include “intent to harm” element and thus could not be asserted against employees in their individual capacities under SCTCA
  • finding there can be no liability against public-entity employees in their individual capacities under section 15-78-70(b) of the South Carolina Code when the elements of the torts alleged did not include \intent to harm or actual malice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.