Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/15/2020
State v. Chittenden
Citations
- 305 Or. App. 483
- 470 P.3d 424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the material witness exception did not apply because there was “no indication” that the officer reason- ably believed that the defendant had witnessed any recent crime “ ‘involving danger of forcible injury to a person’ ” (quoting Fair, 353 Or at 609)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aoyagi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
- State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
- State v. BackstrandOregon Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 103×
- State v. FairOregon Supreme Court· 2013-05-31· cited 88×
- State v. Arreola-BotelloOregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-15· cited 82×
- State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-07· cited 75×
- State v. AcunaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.