Skip to main content

State v. Shumway

Citations

  • 861 P.2d 384
  • 124 Or. App. 131
  • 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding factor officer may have to consider is whether informant has ulterior motive for coming forward
  • determining that the first fac- tor was met, even though the informant did not provide his name to law enforcement, because “there [was] no indication that he was unwilling to do that,” and the informant spoke to the officer in person
  • inferring personal knowledge from level of detail in an informant’s account
  • inferring personal knowledge from level of detail in an informant’s account
  • officer in a park was approached by a citizen who reported that a person driving a green truck was drunk, driving erratically, and had angrily confronted other people in the park; tip found reliable
  • officer in a park was ap proached by a citizen who reported that a person driving a green truck was drunk, driving erratically, and had angrily confronted other people in the park; tip found reliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Deits, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.