State v. Simpson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an infor- mant’s “report was sufficiently reliable” despite the first factor weighing against reliability
• holding that, when an informant did not identify herself or make the report in person, and the officer stopped the defendant before know- ing whether the informant remained at the scene, the first factor was not satisfied
• where the officer’s observations “corroborated at least some of the information in the report” and did not contradict anything in it
• an anonymous report that a yellow Corvette was involved in a traffic accident that included the Corvette’s license plate number, the location of the vehicle, and that the driver was intoxicated, was sufficiently detailed to infer that the caller “did not fabricate it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rudnitskyy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-29· cited 10×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 4×
• State v. Hunt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-04· cited 2×
• State v. Cage
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• State v. Mitchele
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29· cited 33×
• State v. Black
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-18· cited 32×
• State v. Bybee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-23· cited 27×
• State v. Shumway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-20· cited 17×
• State v. Koester
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-09· cited 17×
• State v. Hames
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 15×
• State v. Vanness
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-25· cited 12×
• State v. Lindstrom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-12-18· cited 10×