Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/10/1986

State v. Dunning

Citations

724 P.2d 924
81 Or. App. 296
1986 Ore. App. LEXIS 3339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Corroboration * * * by co-informants can establish an unnamed informant’s reliability.”
“Corroboration * * * by co-informants can establish an unnamed informant’s reliability.”
verified that the defendant and another are co-owners of business, the business office is located in an unmarked cubicle inside another office, and the defendant lives with a named woman who works for a named company; provided source of telephone number
verified that the defendant and another are co-owners of business, the business office is located in an unmarked cubicle inside another office, and the defendant lives with a named woman who works for a named company; provided source of telephone number

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Hoomissen Young, Young, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.