Skip to main content

State v. Shields

Citations

  • 309 Or. App. 516
  • 482 P.3d 784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider the state’s proffered alternative basis to affirm when it neither addressed the Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. conditions nor explained why this court should exercise its discretion
  • declining to address state’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal where state “neither addressed Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. conditions, nor explained why we should exercise our discretion”
  • “Under Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc., it ‘is a matter of prudential discretion and not compulsion’ whether to affirm on an alter- native basis raised for the first time on appeal. Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 46, 56, 245 P3d 688 (2010).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.