State v. Golden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Had the drafters [of the sen- tencing guidelines] intended conduct to be considered, they could have drafted a rule that was not limited only to con- sideration of the elements of an offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Yarbor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-03-08· cited 10×
• State v. Provencio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-03-18· cited 7×
• State v. Shields
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-03· cited 5×
• State v. Leslie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-17· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moeller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-06· cited 84×
• State v. Moeller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-08-29· cited 81×
• Commonwealth v. Ferrer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-12-12· cited 26×
• State v. Tapp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-27· cited 14×