Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/21/2021
State v. Slater
Citations
- 310 Or. App. 746
- 487 P.3d 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court erred in relying on replacement value when the state failed to establish that the market value was not reasonably ascertainable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shorr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
- State v. HedgpethOregon Supreme Court· 2019-11-21· cited 85×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 29×
- State v. CallaghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-03-01· cited 27×
- State v. G. L. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 20×
- State v. StowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-06· cited 18×
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 14×
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-29· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. H. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-22· cited 8×
- State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-26· cited 5×
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-03· cited 5×
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.