State v. Torres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for resentencing with- out conducting element-matching analysis where the state had not carried its burden, because it did not establish the elements of defendant’s out-of-state offense nor that that offense matched an Oregon offense
• “Whether an offense is a lesser included [offense] of a charged crime depends on whether (1) one offense is necessarily included within the other because the elements of the former are subsumed in the latter or (2
• “Whether an offense is a lesser included of a charged crime depends on whether (1) one offense is necessarily included within the other because the elements of the former are subsumed in the latter or (2
• “Whether an offense is a lesser included of a charged crime depends on whether (1) one offense is necessarily included within the other because the elements of the former are subsumed in the latter or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sanders
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-08-06· cited 27×
• State v. Chapman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-13· cited 10×
• State v. Shields
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-03· cited 5×
• State v. Crain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. G. K. S.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-29· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Ford
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 35×
• State v. Torres
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-06-12· cited 8×
• Frederiksen v. Ostermeier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 4×