Skip to main content

State v. Shepherd

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3915

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's tampering-with-evidence conviction is based on sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant's confrontation rights were not violated. Defendant-appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.