Skip to main content

State v. Mendenhall

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3297

Syllabus

Due Process Confrontation Clause Felony Sentencing Consecutive Sentencing R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court did not violate defendant-appellant's right to due process or right to confront witnesses against him. Defendant-appellant's prison sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. Because the trial court made the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences and those findings are supported by the record, defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.