State v. Shabazz

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 7199

Syllabus

The trial court correctly concluded that Crim.R. 52(B) does not provide a mechanism for obtaining postconviction relief. Further, the trial court did not err by construing Defendant-appellant's motion as one for postconviction relief or a new trial. Finally, the trial court did not err when concluding that Defendant-appellant's motion, whether construed as a petition for postconviction relief or for a new trial, was not timely filed. Judgment affirmed.