Oregon Supreme Court· 6/25/2009

State v. Serrano

Citations

210 P.3d 892
346 Or. 311
2009 Ore. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that, although the commentary is not an official part of the code, “it provides highly useful background regarding each rule and guidance to courts and attorneys in interpreting [the code]” (internal quotation marks omitted)
explaining that, although the commentary is not an official part of the code, “it provides highly useful background regarding each rule and guidance to courts and attorneys in interpreting [the code]” (internal quotation marks omitted)
applying interpretive framework described in State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 206 P3d 1042 (2009), to OEC 505
looking to 1981 Conference Committee Commentary as the “principal source of legislative history” for the Oregon Evidence Code
disclaiming reliance on the use of passive voice in statutory text where use did not \necessarily reflect\ which actor's intent governed confidentiality under OEC 505(1)
disclaiming reliance on the use of passive voice in statutory text where use did not “necessarily reflect” which actor’s intent governed confidentiality under OEC 505(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.