State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. Haas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the scope of the term “employee” in OEC 503(l)(d) was ambiguous
• concluding that the scope of the term 'employee' in OEC 503(1)(d) was ambiguous
• stating that Legislative Commentary on the Oregon Evidence Code should be considered part of legislative history
• stating that we review “the record in a manner consistent with the trial court’s ruling under OEC 104(1) and assume that the trial court found facts consistent with its final conclusion”
• establishing the “totality of the circumstances” and stating, “[t]he court must determine whether there is a causal relationship between the promise and the confession”
• reviewing a trial court's decision regarding waiver of attorney-client privilege for \errors of law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).