State v. Pena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that use of passive voice indicated that either lawyer or defendant could move for removal of judge
• statute using the phrase “shall be made” did not specify which actors could move for a change of judge
• because ORS 14.270 used the phrase “shall be made,” which was “worded in the passive voice,” the statute did not specify what actor or actors could move for a change of judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Serrano
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 29×
• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-08-16· cited 26×
• Providence Health System v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 16×
• State v. Neff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-26· cited 8×
• State v. Ovalle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-26· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Murchison.
  Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
• State Ex Rel. Oliver v. Crookham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-01-21· cited 16×
• State Ex Rel. Kafoury v. Jones
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 6×
• Allee v. Morrow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-11· cited 1×