State v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant denied permission to file supplemental brief to raise unpreserved claim premised on new federal interpretation of jury instruction language because, even if claim were allowed, it clearly would fail on merits, as it was settled law that state law controlled defendant’s claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Watson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-11-30· cited 19×
• State v. Armadore
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-03-23· cited 15×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-25· cited 103×
• United States v. Doyle
  Second Circuit· 1997-12-04· cited 63×
• State v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-03-06· cited 45×
• State v. Sebastian
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-09-02· cited 25×
• State v. Vas
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1997-01-07· cited 13×