State v. Scott
Citations
- 195 N.E.3d 244
- 2022 Ohio 3020
Syllabus
SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE – EXCESSIVE WINDOW TINT – R.C. 4513.241 – OHIO ADM.CODE 4501-41-03 – IMPROPER CHANGE OF COURSE – RUNNING A RED LIGHT – CINCINNATI MUNICIPAL CODE 506-40 – CINCINNATI MUNICIPAL CODE 506-80: Defendant's conviction for excessive window tint under R.C. 4513.241 was not based on sufficient evidence where the state failed to prove that defendant's windows were tinted in violation of the light-transmittance standards set forth in Ohio Adm.Code 4501-41-03. Defendant's convictions for improper change of course and running a red light were based on sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where an officer testified that he saw defendant's car violate the law and came to the scene to verify that the correct car had been pulled over, and defendant testified that she drove past the officer.
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-03-02· cited 70×
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-02· cited 56×
- Hoffman v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 32×
- Nestle R&D Center, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 9×
- State v. GuthrieOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-14· cited 7×
- United States v. TorbertS.D. Ohio· 2016-09-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.