State v. Fleckinger
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5659
Syllabus
CONSTITIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – AUTOMOBILES/CRIMINAL – SEARCH AND SEIZURE - FOURTH AMENDMENT - REASONABLE SUSPICION – STOP OF VEHICLE – WINDOW-TINT VIOLATION: The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence found in the vehicle she was driving where a police officer stopped the vehicle for a window-tint violation because he saw a vehicle with extremely tinted front windows and windshield, and the tint prevented him from determining whether the driver of the vehicle was male or female.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-30· cited 666×
- State v. Hawkins (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-10-16· cited 75×
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-01· cited 38×
- State v. DavenportOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 24×
- State v. ErkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 17×
- State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-25· cited 16×
- State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-16· cited 6×
- State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-31· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.