State v. Guthrie

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 501

Syllabus

CRIMINAL DAMAGING – RESTITUTION: Defendant's conviction for criminal damaging was not against the sufficiency or weight of the evidence: the evidence supported the inference that defendant knowingly damaged the victim's car mirror by slamming the mirror into the side of the car, causing the plastic casing to break apart. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding restitution without conducting an evidentiary hearing where defendant failed to object to the amount of restitution ordered, and the court determined the amount awarded based on testimony presented at the sentencing hearing of a repair estimate obtained by the victim.