Indiana Supreme Court· 3/1/2012
State v. Scott
Citations
- 966 N.E.2d 85
- 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 280
- 2012 WL 682081
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an initially consensual encounter lost its consensual nature when an officer retained the defendant’s license and continued to question him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bailey, Baker, Darden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- United States v. Robert LambertTenth Circuit· 1995-02-01· cited 125×
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-02-29· cited 105×
- United States v. Martin Lewis Thompson, A/K/A Guinn Martin ChittyEleventh Circuit· 1983-08-22· cited 95×
- United States v. GuerreroTenth Circuit· 2007-01-02· cited 93×
- Finger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-11-26· cited 88×
- Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 78×
- State v. EstepIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-07-10· cited 39×
- State v. MoriarityIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-08-10· cited 32×
- State v. CalmesIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-18· cited 20×
- State v. LucasIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-01-17· cited 18×
- Shirley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-02-13· cited 12×
- Alexander v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-04-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.