State v. Scott

Citations

• 155 N.E.3d 56
• 2020 Ohio 3230

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the testimony, if believed, established every element of the offense and the appellant could not show prejudice regarding the incorrect date in the indictment. Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law or unsupported by the record where it was authorized by statute and the victim suffered psychological harm as a result of the appellant's conduct.