State v. Bullock
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 693
Syllabus
Conclusory assertions that alternate jurors should not have been seated and that counsel should have moved for mistrial are inadequate. Bare assertion that testimony was incendiary does not support a claim for prosecutorial misconduct or a claim that counsel should have moved for a mistrial. Bare assertion that sentence was excessive insufficient to demonstrate that sentence is contrary to law.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 957×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-15· cited 737×
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1988-07-06· cited 374×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-04· cited 295×
- State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-08· cited 25×
- Lebanon v. BallingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-31· cited 14×
- State v. CombsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-23· cited 13×
- State v. WarnockOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-05· cited 13×
- State v. GrahamOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-05· cited 10×
- State v. TraftonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-17· cited 9×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-26· cited 9×
- State v. ChisenhallOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-20· cited 8×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-04· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.