Skip to main content

State v. Buckland

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 2095

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for gross sexual imposition were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state presented the victim's testimony regarding three distinct incidents of abuse. Further, the inexact dates and three-year timeframe for the offenses set forth in the bill of particulars did not prejudice appellant's ability to defend himself.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.