State v. Schaffer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requesting driver to perform field sobriety tests does not create “compelling” circumstances
• a request to perform field sobriety tests does not create inherently compelling circumstances for Miranda purposes, as a matter of law
• a request to perform field sobriety tests does not create compelling circumstances
• a request to perform field sobriety tests does not create compelling circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fish
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 76×
• Commonwealth v. Hayes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-17· cited 16×
• Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 9×
• State v. Dill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-16· cited 5×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-02-12· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berkemer v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
• State v. Magee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-20· cited 87×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 17×
• State v. Hackworth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-08-08· cited 15×
• State v. Gainer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-10-10· cited 10×